Baurecht
by Brandauer RA
Construction defects

Construction defects after handover: what building owners can claim now

Construction defects often appear only after handover. Which deadlines under section 933 ABGB run, who must prove what, and which claims exist.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your law firm

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Salzburg law firm for real estate, construction and corporate law

Every matter is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In construction cases we look at contract, evidence, deadlines and commercial consequences together.

2 June 2026 · BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

The keys have been handed over, most of the price has been paid, and then the first crack appears in the wall, a damp patch shows up in the cellar, or a window no longer closes. Many building owners assume that handover settles everything. The opposite is true: only after handover does the period begin in which you must secure your rights.

This article explains when a construction defect is legally relevant, which time limits run from handover, and which claims Austrian civil law grants you. The focus is on the warranty. It applies regardless of any fault on the part of your contractor and gives you a tiered system of rights.

Those who act early and verifiably secure their evidence and observe the time limits. Those who wait risk that claims become time-barred or that defects can no longer be proven. From a lawyer’s perspective, the outcome is often decided in the first weeks after a defect appears.

Place your situation

How far is your case, what is the next step?

Answer one or two questions about timing and status. You receive an initial assessment of your warranty rights.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

How long ago was the building handed over?

The warranty period for a building is three years from handover. For the first six months a reversal of the burden of proof applies in your favour.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

The warranty period has likely expired; a damages claim should be examined.

For a building the warranty ends three years after handover. Once the period expires a warranty claim is generally excluded. However, a fault-based damages claim may exist, which follows its own, longer limitation rules and matters especially for hidden defects.

Have it checked whether the period has in fact expired and whether a damages claim comes into consideration. The calculation of when the period begins is often disputed.

02

First give notice of the defect in a provable form and set a deadline for repair.

The first step is the written notice of defect with a deadline for repair. A provable form, such as a registered letter, protects you in a later dispute. Document the defect beforehand with photographs and the date.

Only if the contractor fails to repair within the deadline do price reduction, rescission or a court action come into consideration.

03

Your claims are enforceable; now the right preservation of evidence matters.

If the contractor does not respond or denies the defect, the next steps must be considered: a private expert opinion, judicial preservation of evidence or a court action. Particularly with hidden defects, timely preservation of the condition is decisive, because an expert must establish the cause from the condition that has not yet been repaired.

A legal assessment quickly clarifies which path is the most economically sensible in your case.

When a construction defect is legally relevant

A construction defect exists where the building does not have the contractually agreed quality or the quality ordinarily required. What matters first is what you specifically agreed with the contractor: plans, the scope of services, the samples chosen and the building description form the target condition. Where the actual condition deviates from this, there is a defect.

Where there is no express agreement, the ordinarily required quality applies. A residential building must be watertight, structurally sound and built according to the recognised rules of technology. A heating system must heat, a roof must protect against rain. If the work falls short of this standard, a defect exists even without a special arrangement.

Not every imperfection is a defect in law. Mere matters of taste or deviations that do not impair use or value generally do not give rise to an enforceable claim. Conversely, visual impairments are relevant where a particular execution was agreed. This classification is often the first point of dispute.

The warranty period from handover

For immovable property, that is to say a building, the warranty period under section 933 of the Austrian Civil Code (ABGB) is three years. It begins with the handover or delivery of the work. Within these three years you must assert your warranty claims, if necessary in court, where the contractor does not remedy the defect voluntarily.

The period runs even where a defect is not yet visible. What matters is not when you discover the defect, but that the defect was already present in essence at handover. A hidden construction fault that only manifests as moisture damage after two years is therefore in principle still covered, provided you act in time.

The warranty is independent of fault. You therefore do not need to prove any misconduct on the part of the contractor. It is enough that the work is defective and that the defect stems from a cause that already existed at handover. This distinguishes the warranty from a damages claim, which requires fault.

Burden of proof and the first six months

For the first six months from handover, section 924 ABGB provides for a presumption: if a defect appears in this period, it is presumed to have been present at handover. During this phase the contractor must prove that the work was free of defects at handover if it wishes to defend against the claim.

After these six months the burden of proof shifts. You as the customer must then prove that the defect already had its cause at the time of handover. Particularly with hidden defects, timely preservation of evidence becomes the decisive step, because an expert can often only establish the cause from the condition that has not yet been repaired.

Primary and secondary remedies

What claims the warranty gives you

The ABGB provides a tiered system. Repair or replacement come first, only then price reduction or rescission.

Warranty remedies under the ABGB with requirements and legal effect
Remedy Requirement Legal effect
Repair Primary remedy (sec. 932 ABGB) The defect is curable, repair is possible and not disproportionate The contractor must remedy the defect at its own cost
Replacement Primary remedy (sec. 932 ABGB) Rare for buildings, more relevant for replaceable parts The defective part is replaced by a defect-free one
Price reduction Secondary remedy Repair impossible, disproportionate, refused or failed The remuneration is reduced in proportion to the diminished value
Rescission Secondary remedy Only where the defect is not minor and repair is excluded Reversal of the contract, the exception in construction practice

The secondary remedies generally require that a repair does not lead to the desired result. Rescission of an entire building is available only within narrow limits.

Hidden defects after acceptance

By accepting the work you do not confirm that it is free of defects. Open defects, recognisable at acceptance, should be recorded in the handover protocol. Hidden defects that only appear later remain covered within the warranty period, even if they are not noted in the protocol.

In consumer transactions there is no general obligation to give notice of defects within a particular period. The warranty remains in place during the three years. Nevertheless, for evidentiary reasons it is advisable to report a defect quickly and in writing. In transactions between two businesses, by contrast, the duty to inspect and give notice under section 377 of the Austrian Commercial Code (UGB) applies: here defects must be reported without undue delay.

How to phrase such a notice and which time limits matter are explored in our article on the notice of defects and its deadlines. An overview of the whole topic is provided on our focus page on construction defects and warranty.

A common mistake: anyone who has the defect repaired themselves or by another firm before the contractor has had the opportunity to remedy it often loses the right to reimbursement. First set the contractor a reasonable deadline for repair in writing. Exceptions apply only in urgent cases, such as acute water damage. When in doubt, seek legal advice beforehand.

What to do once a defect appears

Document the defect comprehensively: photographs, the date, a description and, if possible, the circumstances in which it appeared. Keep the contract, the building description and the final invoice to hand. These documents form the basis for the legal classification.

Notify the contractor of the defect in writing and call on it to repair within a set deadline. A provable form, such as a registered letter or an email with confirmation of receipt, protects you later in the event of a dispute. As far as possible, do not alter the defective condition before the cause has been clarified.

If the contractor does not respond or denies the defect, early legal advice is sensible. It can often be clarified whether a private expert opinion, judicial preservation of evidence or a direct action is the right path. Booking an initial consultation (EUR 72) can quickly create clarity.

Frequently asked questions

Construction defects after handover.

How long after handover do I have to assert construction defects? +

For a building the warranty period under section 933 ABGB is three years from handover. Within this period claims must, if necessary, be asserted in court where the contractor does not repair voluntarily. In addition, a fault-based damages claim may exist, which follows its own limitation rules.

Do I have to prove that the contractor caused the defect? +

For the first six months from handover, section 924 ABGB presumes that the defect already existed at handover. After that you must prove that the cause was already present at the time of handover. A presumption of fault applies only to a damages claim within the warranty period, not to the warranty itself, which is fault-independent in any event.

Can I have the defect repaired immediately and claim the cost? +

Generally not without more. As a rule you must first give the contractor the opportunity to repair and set a reasonable deadline for this. Only in urgent exceptional cases, such as imminent danger, may immediate substitute performance be permissible. Clarify this in advance so as not to jeopardise reimbursement.

Topics
construction defectswarrantyhandoverABGBrepair

Defects, a remuneration dispute, looming litigation?

In construction law, deadlines and evidence decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg