Construction litigation and evidence preservation
Secure evidence before it is built over: judicial preservation of evidence, court experts and the preparation of construction litigation.
Construction litigation stands or falls on the evidence. Often the decisive condition has already been built over, remedied or altered before a court can see it. Anyone who cannot prove the defect often loses the case for that reason alone.
We prepare construction proceedings in a structured way: preservation of evidence, court-appointed experts, written submissions and, where it makes sense, an out-of-court settlement. The aim is a solid body of evidence before any hearing takes place.
Securing evidence before it disappears
The most important tool is the judicial preservation of evidence under the ZPO (Code of Civil Procedure). A court-appointed expert records the condition before it changes. Alongside this, private opinions, photographic documentation and witnesses can support the body of evidence.
- judicial preservation of evidence by an appointed expert
- private opinion for an initial assessment and as leverage
- complete photo and video documentation with dates
- securing of construction files, plans and correspondence
The typical course of events
Before the action there is usually a written request setting a deadline. If it remains unsuccessful, preservation of evidence and the action follow. In the proceedings the expert opinion is regularly the centrepiece, often discussed at the hearing.
- request and deadline set for the contracting partner
- judicial preservation of evidence where loss of evidence is threatened
- filing of the action and motions for evidence
- opinion, hearing, settlement or judgment
The role of the court-appointed expert
The court-appointed expert prepares findings and an opinion on the cause, scope and remediation costs of the defect. These findings strongly shape the outcome of the proceedings. We prepare the right questions and review the opinion critically.
How we support you
- assessment of whether and when preservation of evidence makes sense
- filing the application and attending the expert appointment
- assessment of the prospects of success and the cost risk
- representation in settlement talks and in construction litigation
This article provides a general overview of Austrian law and does not replace advice in an individual case. The specific circumstances of your construction project are always decisive.
What clients often ask.
When is judicial preservation of evidence worthwhile? +
How long does construction litigation take? +
Is a private opinion enough in court? +
What cost risk do I bear? +
This may also be relevant to you.
Construction defects and warranty
Identify, notify and enforce defects in the building. Remedy, price reduction, rescission and the warranty periods under Austrian civil law.
Construction contract and remuneration
Works contract, lump-sum and unit prices, additional orders, final invoice and enforcing or defending remuneration claims.
Developer contract and BTVG
Protection of buyers under the Austrian Developer Contract Act: instalment schedule, security models, escrow and unwinding when problems arise.
Defects, a remuneration dispute, looming litigation?
In construction law, deadlines and evidence decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000