Before a binding statement, risk can usually be managed best.
Check the contract, permits, plans and intended statement before signing, approving or continuing works.
This preserves evidence, negotiating position and practical options.
When construction dates slip, delay notice, preliminary works and schedule must be checked before costs and penalties escalate.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, construction and corporate law
Every matter is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In construction cases we look at contract, evidence, deadlines and commercial consequences together.
Construction delay often becomes visible only when the completion date is at risk. The cause is frequently earlier: missing preliminary works, late decisions or trades that are not coordinated.
Extension of time and delay notice should therefore be separated from the pure penalty topic. Before sanctions, the question is who actually influenced the sequence.
This article supplements the existing guide on delay and penalties. It focuses on the narrower situation where dates slip because of preliminary works, cooperation duties or sequence disruptions.
Answer two short questions. You receive an initial orientation on documents and reactions that matter now.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
The assessment helps distinguish prevention, evidence and response.
Check the contract, permits, plans and intended statement before signing, approving or continuing works.
This preserves evidence, negotiating position and practical options.
If a dispute already exists, chronology and records matter. They determine whether payment, reservation, repair or enforcement is sensible.
The key is the connection between contract, actual progress and documented statements.
If documents are missing, request and secure them immediately.
Photos, minutes, emails and invoices help make the facts reliable.
A penalty concerns the legal consequence of missing a date. A delay event concerns the cause why a date cannot be met.
Anyone looking only at the contractual penalty often misses the prior question of cooperation, preliminary works and sequence planning.
This article therefore does not assess the amount of a penalty, but the documentation of disruption.
Preliminary works may include plans, approvals, samples, access, power, water, scaffolding or completed works by other trades.
If a prerequisite is missing, the contractor cannot always simply continue. Conversely, the contractor must not assert disruption in a vague way.
The decisive point is whether the missing prerequisite is described specifically and is truly relevant for the schedule.
A mere statement that delays exist is often not enough. Cause, timing, affected works and impact are needed.
If ÖNORM B 2110 was agreed, contractual notice and documentation duties may be particularly important. Without such agreement, the contract and general works contract law apply.
Clients should check each notice for plausibility, evidence and causal link to the requested extension of time.
A schedule is more than a wish list. It shows dependencies between trades and makes visible which activity affects the critical path.
If the schedule is never updated, it is of limited help in a dispute. Changes, approvals and disruption should be entered continuously.
This later helps assess whether a delay truly follows from the alleged cause.
Request a concrete explanation of the cause, affected works and alleged additional time. Vague weekly estimates are rarely enough.
At the same time, check your own cooperation duties. If a decision or approval is missing, it should be provided quickly and documented.
For larger projects, a joint progress meeting with minutes is useful so that the parties do not later dispute the status at the time.
The table shows which questions should be clarified before costs and penalties.
| Point | To check | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Cause Which prerequisite is missing | Causation for additional time | |
| Notice Timing and content | Evidence of timely reaction | |
| Schedule Critical path | Impact on completion |
An extension of time should never be asserted only in general terms.
A short sequence helps with evidence and response.
Practical tip: Separate shifted dates from cost claims. Only after cause, impact and sphere of responsibility are documented can additional time be assessed legally. Book an initial consultation (72 euros)
An email can matter in practice. It should specify cause, timing, affected works and alleged impact.
No. Check whether the cause is evidenced and whether it actually affects the schedule. General statements should be questioned.
It does not apply automatically, only if agreed. If agreed, notice and documentation may be particularly important.
Überblick page on contract, performance, payment and typical construction disputes.
How documents, expert evidence and litigation risk interact in construction disputes.
Überblick page on defects, repair, price reduction and preserving evidence.
Interactive risk check for clients before signing, paying or escalating.
In construction law, deadlines and evidence decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000